watch/listen to Laurie Anderson's "From the Air": link to
YouTube
In chapter 1, we'll encounter two 19th-century American poets whose very different approaches to
verse were equally challenging to official verse culture of the time. As a matter of form (but
also of content!) Walt Whitman and Emily Dickinson were radicals. What sort of radicalism is this?
In a way, this course is all about exploring expressions of that radicalism from Whitman and
Dickinson to the present day. Such challenges to official verse culture (and, often, American
culture at large) present us with a lineage of ideas about art and expression, a tradition that
can be outlined, mostly followed, somewhat traced. In this course we follow, to the best of our
ability - and given the limits of time - that tradition, and try to make overall sense of it. You
will find that we do this one poem at a time. We will explore Dickinson first, Whitman second, and
then begin to sketch out the major differences between them, which, some say, amount to two
opposite ends of the spectrum of poetic experimentalism and dissent in the 19th century. Which is
to say: on the spectrum of traditional-to-experimental poetry, they are on the same end
(experimental); on the spectrum of experimentalism, their approaches can put them on opposite
ends. In short, they offer us alternative poetic radicalisms, and their influences down the line
(which we will explore next) are both powerful but largely distinct. One question you'll be
prepared to ask by the end of the course: is the Dickinsonian tradition more ascendent and apt in
today's experimental poetry, or the Whitmanian?
1. read William Carlos Williams's "Danse Russe": link to
text
2A.
listen to Williams perform "Danse Russe": link
to PennSound
2B.
read/listen to "Danse
Russe" in text-audio alignment: link
3. read Williams's "Smell!": link to text
4A.
listen to Williams perform "Smell!": link
to PennSound
4B.
read/listen to "Smell!" as text-audio alignment: link to PennSound
5. read Allen Ginsberg's "A Supermarket in California": link to text
6.
listen to Ginsberg perform "A Supermarket in California": link
to PennSound
7. read Williams's "Catholic Bells": link to text
8.
listen to Williams perform "Catholic Bells": link
to PennSound
9. read Ginsberg's "America": link to text
10.
listen to Ginsberg perform "America": link
to PennSound
11.
listen to Ginsberg's drunken reading of "America" in 1956:
link
to audio
12. read the lyrics to Bruce Springsteen's "Land of Hope and Dreams": link to text
13.
watch/listen to Bruce Springsteen perform "Land of Hope and Dreams": link to YouTube
1. read Lorine Niedecker's "Grandfather advised me": link to text
PAPER OPTION #1: How is the Dickinsonian or "intensive" modern poetic practice, as found
specifically in the Dickinson poems we've read, furthered or supported by the poem by Rae
Armantrout on the reading list ("The Way") and by the comments Armantrout made - and poems she
read - when she presented her
own poems "through" Dickinson's at the Writers House in October 2000. The question behind this
paper can be summed up this way: what's so "Dickinsonian" about Armantrout?
Modernism in poetry had many beginnings;
imagism marks just one. But in a fast introduction, this brief but influential movement gives
us a good place to start. Imagists had no use for late Victorian wordiness, flowery figuration and "beautiful" abstraction and they
rejected such qualities through staunch assertions demanding concision, concentration, precise visuality and a sort of super-focused
emotive objectivity. In the first of four parts of chapter 2, we will ask ourselves whether each poem meets the impossible or
nearly impossible standards set out by imagist manifestos. If any given poem "fails" to meet such standards, it is by no means a sign
of "bad poetry." But one way to learn about the rise of poetic modernism is to make discernments based on the poets' own (momentary)
programmatic demands.
1.
listen to brief introduction to imagism: link
to audio
2. read a brief definition of imagism & the imagist manifesto: link
3. read H.D.'s "Sea Rose": link to text
4. read H.D.'s "Oread": link to
text
5. read H.D.'s "Sea Poppies": link to
text
6. read Ezra Pound's "In a Station of the Metro": link to text
7. read Pound's "In a Station of the Metro" as it originally appeared in Poetry
magazine: link to
text
8. read William Carlos Williams's "Between Walls": link to text
9A.
listen to Williams perform "Between Walls": link
to PennSound
9B.
read/listen with text-audio alignment to Williams's "Between Walls": link to PennSound
10.
listen to a 25-min. discussion of "Between Walls": link to PoemTalk
11. read two pages from Ernest Hemingway's early prose: link
to text
12. read Ezra Pound's "The Encounter": link to text
13. read William Carlos Williams's "The Red Wheelbarrow": link to text
14A.
listen to four performances by Williams of "The Red Wheelbarrow": link
to audio
14B.
listen to five performances by Williams of "The Red Wheelbarrow" as text-audio alignment:
link to
PennSound
PAPER OPTION #2: What does the wording (the arrangement of the words) in H.D.'s "Sea Rose" and
"Oread" have to do with the wording of Ernest Hemingway's early prose (in the sample we are
reading)? There is not much connection between H.D. and Hemingway, but if you write this essay you
are writing about a way in which their writing - their way of arranging words - is similar.
1. read two brief biographical profiles of Williams: links 1, 2
2. read Williams's "Lines": link to text
3. read Williams's comment on poems as word-machines: link to text
4. read Williams's "By the road to the contagious hospital" from Spring and All: link
5.
listen to Williams perform "By the road to the contagious hospital": link
to PennSound
6. read Williams's "The rose is obsolete" from Spring and All: link to text
7.
listen to Filreis talk about Williams's "The rose is obsolete" (6 mins.): link
to audio
8. read Williams's "This Is Just to Say":
link to text
9.
listen to five of Williams's performances of "This Is Just to Say": link
to audio
10.
listen to Williams
discuss "This Is Just to Say" and Flossie's response: link
to audio
11. read Flossie Williams's reply to "This Is Just to Say": link to text
12.
watch a
museum-goer's video of Marcel Duchamp's "Fountain" at SFMOMA: link to YouTube
13. look at photograph of Duchamp's
"Fountain": link to
photo
14. read two versions Williams's poem called "Young Woman at a Window": versions 1 & 2
15. read Williams's
"Portait of a Lady": link to
text
16.
listen to three recordings of Williams reading "Portrait of a Lady": 1,
2,
3
17. look closely at Marcel Duchamp's "Nude Desecnding a Staircase": link
PAPER OPTION #3: Williams's "This Is Just to Say" was written "for" and/or "to" Williams's wife
Flossie; in a sense, it's "just" a household message, saying: "Sorry, I took the plums you were
going to eat." Read the "Note to 'This Is Just to Say'" and be sure you understand how and why
Flossie made her rejoinder to her husband in the form of her own writing. Being sure to bring in
your judgment as to the overall success or failure of imagism generally, write an essay taking one
of the following positions: (a) William Carlos Williams's "This Is Just to Say" is manifestly
poetic, whereas Flossie Williams's "Reply" obviously is unpoetic or non-poetic, or (b) Williams's
"This Is Just to Say" is no more of a poem than Flossie's reply.
PAPER OPTION #4: You are reading two distinct versions of Williams's poem "Young Woman at a
Window." I realize that you needn't specifically prefer one over the other, but for this paper I
am asking you to do so unequivocally. Which do you prefer and why? On what basis (formalist,
ethical, political, structural [I realize these are overlapping categories]) do you make your
preference?
Gertrude Stein's contribution to
modernist poetry and poetics cannot be overstated, so now, in the
third section of chapter 2 we turn to her, spending this day
on a selection of her supposedly "difficult" writings. The difficulty of deriving any sort of
conventional semantic meaning from the short prose-poems that comprise Tender Buttons turns out to
be, for many readers, a helpful inducement to read for other kinds of signifying. As we hope
you'll see from our class discussions, such difficulty need not excuse us from
close reading. Stein's poems really can be interpreted. They might eschew representation, but by
no means do they turn away from reference. The hard work you do in this part of chapter 2 will be
amply rewarded when we get to chapter 9; Stein is a particular influence on John Ashbery in
chapter 8, but she is an important influence on nearly every poet we'll read in chapter 9. As a
matter of fact, here in chapter 2 we have a chance to listen to Jackson Mac Low (a chapter 9 poet)
talk about why he finds Stein's opaque and difficult Tender Buttons so nonetheless meaningful. And
we hear Joan Retallack (another chapter 9 poet) paying homage to Stein's "Composition as
Explanation."
1. read Stein's "The Long Dress" from Tender Buttons: link to text [scroll down or control-F to search]
2. read Marjorie Perloff's comment on Stein and in particular on "A Carafe, That Is a Blind
Glass": link to text
3. read Gertrude Stein, "A Carafe, That Is a Blind Glass," from the "Objects" section of
Tender Buttons: link to text
4.
listen to Jackson Mac Low's 1978 reading of Stein's "A Carafe, That Is a Blind Glass": link
to PennSound
5.
listen to Jackson Mac Low's commentary on Tender Buttons: link
to PennSound
6. read Stein's "Water Raining" and "Malachite" from Tender Buttons: link to text [scroll down or search]
7. read Stein on narrative: link
8. read Stein on the noun: link
9. read Stein on loving repeating: link
10. read Stein on composition: link
11.
listen to Joan Retallack reading some "propositions" from Stein's "Composition as
Explanation": link
to audio
12. read Stein's "Let Us Describe": link
to
text [scroll down]
13. read Stein's "If I Told Him: A Completed Portrait of Picasso" and Ulla Dydo's comment: link to text
14A.
listen to Stein reading "If I Told Him": link
to PennSound
14B.
read/listen with
text-audio alignment of Stein's "If I Told Him": link to PennSound
15.
watch video of dance choreographed to Stein's "If I Told Him": link to YouTube
16.
listen to Marjorie Perloff speaking about Stein's portraits: link to
audio
17. read Stein's "A Very Valentine": link to text
18. read William Carlos Williams on Stein: link
19. read a brief introduction to Stein's Tender Buttons: link to text
20. read Stein's review of Alfred Kreymborg's Troubador: link to text
21. read Mark Van Doren's review Kreymborg's Troubador: link to text
PAPER OPTION #5: Write this paper only after reading very carefully all of the Gertrude Stein
selections assigned for this day. Being sure to bring in your general judgment as to the success
or failure of Stein's modernist use of language, take one of the following two positions: (a)
Stein's experimental review of Alfred Kreymborg's book presents a more perceptive evaluation than
does Van Doren's conventional review; (b) Van Doren's review, although stylistically conventional,
is far and away the more perceptive of the two.
PAPER OPTION #6: Write an essay that is a close reading of "The Long Dress" by Stein. Be sure to
account for every line. There is no authoritative interpretation of a poem such as those Stein
wrote for Tender Buttons. Resist the temptation to over-interpret but do try to account for
all the words here. Is there anything in this poem that is meta-poetic? What, if anything, do
dresses have to do with writing? Note: We are aware that this paper is not a "position paper"
like some of the others, although you should not shy from taking interpretive positions.
"The Baroness" (Elsa von Freytag Loringhoven) was way out there. But because she so intensely
embodied modernist experimentalism, learning something about her life and writing is an apt way,
in part, to end our brief introduction to poetic modernism roughly from 1912-1929. The three
instances of modernist extremity we encounter in chapter 2.4 are very different expressions of
"High Modernism." Well, the Baroness was certainly high on highballs when she wrote the
poem of hers we'll read - or, rather, her language remarkably simulates a reeling discombulation,
such that its critique of 1920s-style commercialism (not in itself unusual at the time) has a very
sharp edge. She was "New York Dada" epitomized; Tristan Tzara's ideas about cutting up newspapers
to form "personal" poems were, among his many other radical notions, crucial to the dadaist
import. And John Peale Bishop? Well, as you'll see, he's another story altogether; his sonnet sets
us up well for our approach to antimodernist doubts expressed by the poets of chapters 3, 4 and 5.
1. read about Alfred Jarry: link to
text
2. read about Maxwell Bodenheim: link to text
3.
listen to an brief biographical profile of the Baroness Elsa von Freytag Loringhoven: link
to audio
4.
listen to a reading from Kenneth Rexroth's recollection of the Baroness: link
to audio
5. look at fashion images of "the Baroness look" in 2002: link
6. read William Carlos Williams's recollection of the Baroness from his autobiography: link to text
7. read jacket blurb by Filreis for Irene Gammel's biography of the Baroness: link
8. read Baroness Elsa von Freytag Loringhoven's "A Dozen Cocktails--Please": link to text
9. look at scholarly digital edition of "A Dozen Cocktails--Please" as edited by Tanya
Clement: link to site
10. look at photograph of former 88'er dressed as the Baroness: link
11. read Baroness Elsa's poem "Ancestry": link to text
12. read Edna St. Vincent Millay's "First Fig": link to text [note: read only the first
poem]
13. read Edna St. Vincent Millay's "Grown Up": link to text
14. read one of Edna St. Vincent Millay's many sonnets: link to text
15. read a definition of the sonnet: link
16. read John Peale Bishop's "A Recollection": link to text
The
1930s were of course years of economic crisis - the Depression. Like most other people, poets
felt the urgency induced by privation, lack of opportunity, and desperation. But poets had all
along been inclined toward social as well as aesthetic experimentalism; and they could write
effectively, and so many felt they could be useful in the larger effort to find solutions - some
modestly reformist, some extremer - to the nation's and the world's huge problems. When the
Depression set in, many poets embraced radical critiques of the economic status quo and some
joined revolutionary groups such as the Communist Party of the U.S. Such ideological journeys were
often quite brief, and most once-Communist poets regretted it later, and said so. One of the myths
created later is that all modernist poets repudiated modernism's embrace of opaqueness,
indirection, and self-referentiality and began to write clearly and "transparently" so that masses
of people could understand their language. This is not true; many pre-1930s modernists continued
to write in experimental modes and remained committed to cubism, surrealism, dadaism, etc., and
joined radical causes. But for our purposes here in this very brief chapter 3, we look at several
poets whose poems, it might be said, bear radical content but deliver that content in traditional
- one might say, conservative - forms. What can we make of this apparent contradiction or irony?
What can we learn here about modernism's relation to political life? (Note that we also glance at
two poets - Kenneth Fearing and Bob Brown - whose political radicalism did not entail
giving up on formal experimentation. And then you'll see that our old friend Bill Williams is here
too. In the mid-1930s WCW got involved with the political left and his poems contained more
"social content" than usual.)
Our
course is a limited survey and its selections are drastic - never more so than here in chapter
4. Although Harlem Renaissance writers such as Jean Toomer (in works like Cane) engaged a
modernist sense of genre, we look at two poets whose sense of the relation between traditional
stanza form and the content of racist hatred helps us understand the limits of formal experiment.
Claude McKay's sense of the complicated inheritance of English prosody will come back
to us at the very end of the course.
PAPER OPTION #7: Consider Cullen's poem "Incident." Write a paper stating your position on the
following question: Does Cullen's use of traditional poetic form diminish the power of the
incident he describes in the poem? Explain your position. And be sure to describe the stanza form
he uses.
PAPER OPTION #8: Consider Claude McKay's poem "If We Must Die." Write a paper stating your
position on the following question: Does McKay's use of traditional poetic form diminish the power
of the situation he describes in the poem and/or of the response he advocates? Explain your
position. And be sure to describe the stanza form he uses.
We
will not actually have a class session on chapter 5. But most of you will have attended the
special session on "Mending Wall" held on October 11, and we ask that you read "Mending Wall" and
listen to Frost performing the poem, and then that you watch a short film of me and some ex-88'ers
discussing the poem. Frost is widely considered a major modern American poet but his relationship to modernism
is mostly antagonistic. In our series of short chapters featuring poets' doubts about aspects of
the modernist revolution, we consider just this one poem by Frost for its frank but also witty way
of
raising the issue of the subject-object relations. The speaker and another figure find themselves
on either side of a wall. Should that wall come down? Does Frost's answer to that question have
anything to do with his famous antimodernist complaint - that free verse is "like playing tennis
without a net"?
1. read Robert Frost's "Mending Wall": link to text
2. listen to Robert Frost perform the poem: link to audio
3. watch video discussion of Frost's "Mending Wall": link to video
There
are several ways of looking generally at U.S. poetry in the first postwar (post-World War
II) period, 1945-60. No single generalization will do, but our course implies two main trends.
First, there was a retrenchment, a "coming home," a consolidation - a mainstreaming of modernism
and, for some, a new formalist (or neo-formalist) reaction against what was deemed modernist
experimental excess. This consolidation coincided with a renewed cultural caution or conservatism
or quietism, generally understood as caused by or aided by fears of communism; concerns about
women who had entered the wartime workplace and were now expected to resume domestic life; the
ease of life during a time of economic prosperity; the massification of university education; the
flight from the cities; and a suburbanization of values and lifestyle. For some this meant
assuming modernist gains - free verse, wide choice of subject matter, everyday diction - while
suppressing radical experiment. For others this meant an outright antimodernism, although it was
now more conservative than the antimodernism of poets in chapters 3 and 5. The latter impulse
expressed itself in a neo-classicist use of satire and irony - a kind of new Augustan poetics.
Chapter
6 gives us a brief look at this postwar neo-formalism. A second trend, very different, was
the explosion of a new poetic radicalism - fueled by a sometimes ecstatic and often antic negative
response to the above-mentioned quietism and poetic conservatism. Drawing on the experimental
spirit of modernism - and sometimes celebrating the influence of individual modernist poets - this
trend very roughly becomes known as the "New American" poetry. The beats of chapter 7 and the New
York School poets of chapter 8 are instances of this. There are other New American approaches and
groupings, to be sure, but we will not have time to consider them except in passing references.
But first let us quickly end our rapid tour through the doubters and troublers of
chapters 3, 4, 5 & 6 - with a glance at the neo-formalists.
3. watch video of Wilbur introducing "Cottage Street, 1953": link to video
4. watch video of Wilbur reading "Cottage Street, 1953": link to video
PAPER OPTION #9: There are many differences between X. J. Kennedy's and Marcel Duchamp's "Nude
Descending a Staircase." What are they? List them and explain each difference, one by one. No need
to write a fancily organized essay. Make a list of the differences and explain each, being sure to
do some "close reading" of the Duchamp painting and the Kennedy poem. Note: We are aware that
this paper entails close reading and isn't a "position paper" like some of the others. But don't
shy from taking intepretive positions. For one thing, you should feel free, toward the end, to
assert where and how one of the two poems fails and the other succeeds.
The
so-called "New American Poetry," emerging in the late 1940s and 1950s, went in many
directions; some trends, styles and approaches overlapped and some were or seemed more distinct
and separable than others. The "Beat" poets were a fairly distinct community of poets and so it
becomes a little easier than otherwise to study their ecstatic, antic, apparently anti-poetic
break with official verse culture as a coherent movement. Our approach, in just one week, looks
at two "classic" Beats (Ginsberg and Kerouac) and then quickly moves off to adjacent figures.
Creeley was not a Beat poet but his most famous poem engages poetic, psychological and social
matters with which Ginsberg and Kerouac and the others were obsessed. Anne Waldman is an
"outrider" poet and more closely associated with the second generation of "New York School"
poets, but was a dear friend of Ginsberg and learned a great deal from his political pedagogy.
Amiri Baraka, as Leroi Jones, was a Beat poet for a few years and then broke away. The poem by
Baraka we study here gives us a chance to look back on Countee Cullen's traditionally formal
poetic response to racist hatred. Our focus on Kerouac is a little unusual; he of course is known
more as a novelist than a poet. But his "babble flow" has been a significant influence on
contemporary poets - more than his narrative fictional stance as psychosocial itinerant. We will
have occasion, then, to examine and question Kerouac's - and implicitly Ginsberg's - claim to be
writing naturally spontaneous language. Our Chapter 9 poets for the most part doubt such claims.
Above left: Anne Waldman and Jack Kerouac.
5. watch video of Waldman perform "Rogue State": link to video
13. watch a video of Maggie Estep performing "I'm an Emotional Idiot So Get Away from Me": link to video
14. watch an MTV video promo featuring Maggie Estep: link to video
Frank
O'Hara, John Ashbery, Kenneth Koch and Barbara Guest represent the New York School of poetry
in this week of our course. We met Anne Waldman briefly in chapter 7 - from the "second
generation" New York School. Here now we add two others of the second generation: Ted Berrigan and
Bernadette Mayer. Our super-close readings of Guest's "20" and Ashbery's "Some Trees" are
intended, in part, to show that the non-narrative or anti-narrative styles of this group - and
their propensity for sudden shifts in pronoun and non-sequitur imagery, and for
inside-the-community name dropping - nonetheless produce writing that can be interpreted line by
line. During this week, a bare-minimum introduction to this playful postmodernity, we will get a
bit of pastiche from Koch, several instances of O'Hara's I-do-this-I-do-that explorations of
lunchtime, and examples of Ashbery's opaque lyricism, Guest's memory-as-word associationalism,
Berrigan's anti-narrative as daily social resistance, and Mayer's application of O'Hara's
exuberant dailiness to a woman's life and language.
2. watch a video discussion of O'Hara's "A Step away from Them": link to video
5. watch a video discussion of Guest's "20": link
to
video
PAPER OPTION #10: Write an essay that presents a close reading of O'Hara's "Why I Am Not a
Painter." Be sure to answer the question or problem he poses in the title. Why does he prefer to
be a poet? Why is he a poet and not a painter? What, despite all the similarities between what he
does as a poet and what Mike Goldberg does as a painter, is finally the difference between the way
they work? Note: We are aware that this paper entails close reading and is not a "position
paper" like some of the others. But don't shy from taking clear interpretive positions.
PAPER OPTION #11: Write an essay that presents a close reading of O'Hara's poem "Like." Be sure to
explain what you think he means by the title. The title word connotes several things. Try to cover
everything it connotes and what, if anything, does it have to do with the writing of the poem?
Note: We are aware that this paper entails close reading and is not so much a position paper
like some of the others. But don't shy from taking clear interpretive positions.
PAPER OPTION #12: Write an essay that presents a close reading of Ashbery's "The Grapevine." This
is a difficult poem, but do the best that you can. Try to account for every line. And be sure to
describe what you think the poem is saying overall/in general. What is its topic or issue?
By starting with Silliman's
"Albany" and Hejinian's My Life, we focus on ways in which - and reasons why - Language
poets refused conventional sequential, cause-and-effect presentations of the writing self. The
self is languaged - is formed by and in language - and is multiple across time (moments and eras)
and thus from paratactic sentence to paratactic sentence. While this radical revision of the
concept of the lyric self (and of the genre of memoir) emphasizes one aspect of the Language
Poetry movement at the expense of several other important ideas and practices, it is, we feel, an
excellent way to introduce the group. Bob Perelman's "Chronic Meanings," aside from its
contribution to this introduction, also picks up a theme of our course: the experimental writer
attempts to encounter death (loss, grief, absence) by somehow making the form of the writing
befit that discontinuity and disruption. We began this theme with Stein's "Let Us Decide" and
continued it with O'Hara's "The Day Lady Died," and will proceed with Jackson Mac Low's "A
Vocabulary for Peter Innisfree Moore" in chapter 9.2. Above, left to right: Susan Howe, Ron
Silliman, Lyn Hejinian.
PAPER OPTION #13: For this paper, read and listen to our excerpt from Hejinian's My Life
and
read
and listen
to Silliman's "Albany" and think about what the two poems have in common in terms of their
attitude toward autobiographical writing. What specifically do they have in common? Be sure to
consider, at least briefly in your paper, the way that a poet like Frank O'Hara handled describing
a life in his poems. Do the life-writings of Silliman and Hejinian flow out of some or all of
O'Hara's ideas?
16. watch video discussion of Howe's Dickinson:
link to ModPo video
When Jackson Mac Low put a
body of language (for instance a poem by Gertrude Stein) through a rigorous procedure, he would
say that he created (or "wrote" - in the sense of computer programming) the procedure and
that the procedure created the poem. One of his goals was to experiment with the
elimination or evacuation or at least the suppression of poetic ego. In this sense his work
stands alongside that of Silliman and Hejinian who (by other means) sought to question the stable
lyric subject that had been for so long been associated with the writing of poetry, and with
imagination generally. On this point the chapter 9 poets are unified in breaking from modernism's
implicit and often explicit claim of creative, a-world-in-a-poem-making genius. But otherwise the
aesthetic connection between, for instance, Mac Low and Stein is strongly positive.
Above,
left to right: Jena Osman, John Cage, Joan Retallack, Jackson Mac Low.
5. watch video discussion of Cage's adagia: link
to video
PAPER OPTION #14: If you think Jackson Maclow's poem-performance based on 960 words and letters
formed from the name
of his deceased friend, "A Vocabulary for Peter Innisfree Moore," is both beautiful and
intellectually legitimate and interesting, take the occasion of writing this paper to argue that
position. Be sure to link this to your own defense of "chance" poetry in general.
4. watch video discussion of Mac Low on Stein: link
to video
Not every artist we meet here
claims to be part of a trend or movement now widely known as conceptualist poetics. Some embrace
or have embraced the term: Kenneth Goldsmith, Christian Bok, Caroline Bergvall. Others, such as
Rosmarie Waldrop, have been involved in appropriative and unoriginal practices for decades. Erica
Baum is a photographer of found language who seems to thrive in the atmosphere created by the
explicit conceptualists. Michael Magee is an original Flarfist, which some see as divergent from
conceptualism but here at least seems certainly a cousin. Others we encounter in our final week
(Jennifer Scappettone and Tracie Morris) are using unoriginality and linguistic borrowing and
"writing through" for their own reasons and are creating distinct effects. But every artist in
chapter 9.3 displays an intense virtuosity that defies what most folks at first expect from
writings made from such an adamant rejection of creativity. We hope that despite the strangeness
of it all you will find a great deal of pleasure in watching them undertake their
hyper-concentrated, seemingly impossible projects. What can look easy in such experimentalism is
often demanding in the extreme. Is there a better example of this than Eunoia? Left to
right: Christian Bok, Tracie Morris, Erica Baum's "Card Catalogues," Kenneth Goldsmith.
6. watch video discussion of Erica Baum's art: link to video
watch video on Magee's
"Pledge" & My Angie Dickinson: link to
video
watch a video of Tracie
Morris performing "Afrika": link to video
PAPER OPTION #15: For this paper, go to PennSound's page presenting the English 88-sponsored
conversation between Jena Osman and Kenneth Goldsmith. Read summaries of the segmented audio
recording of this event, and then listen to all the audio segments of the discussion. Write a
paper that summarizes the discussion and explains the somewhat different positions taken by Osman
and Goldsmith. Their art and ideas are certainly related; they are certainly in the same "camp" or
faction of contemporary poetry and poetics. But they differ on several key issues. What are these
issues? Osman is more aligned with the chapter 9.2 poets and Goldsmith of course is more aligned
with the chapter 9.3 poets and artists. Use this paper as an opportunity to make general
distinctions between chapters 9.2 and 9.3. You can probably already tell that this paper will be
longer than the others; you may write as long an essay as you think appropriate to the topic.
Note that this paper is due on Tuesday, November 29.